Devrimci İslam Tarihi

“This is exactly where the mistake the Muslim perception makes in telling history falls: excessive It is based on the state and dynasty-centered narrative of structures, men, dominant peoples and dominant cultures that define themselves as subjects to a degree. Most of what has been told to us as the history of Islam is only a history of sovereign shahs and sultans, thus erasing the social and democratic dimension of Islam. (…) Islam is a universal religion of humanity that has been going on since Adam. In every phase, it stands on the side of the oppressed against the oppressors, and each of its prophets is shaped as a 'savior', as a liberation movement of human communities against tyrannical rulers. Abraham against Nimrod, the savior of his people, Moses against Pharaoh, Jesus against Rome, and Muhammad as the universal resister against all oppressors... However, within this religion, there are Pharisees and churches who try to turn this religion into an ideology of domination and thus distort it. Yazits came out. Hussein's struggle against Yazid still continues, just like Muhammad's (as) struggle against Abu Jahl continues... 

(…) However, what has been told to us for many years as the history of Islam is not the history of the oppressed people saved by Islam, but the history of those who re-established their power using the name of Islam and It is the history of powerful people who have little to do with . Unfortunately, the true history of Islam has not yet been told to all humanity until today. What is presented as Islamic history is actually the history of principalities and states. This is one aspect of the greatest injustice and slander against Islam. This understanding of history kept alive within Islam is a kind of continuation of the western distortion of history by Muslims. Islam is based not on states and rulers, but on the oppressed, the weak, the virtuous, and humanity in every aspect. If anything is to be told as the history of Islam, it should be these. Because Islam has included them in history as subjects who are subject to God's command and good news. These are the real subjects of history. However, they were excluded from history.

(…) Islam, The name of the cause of the strange and the weak in history and today should undoubtedly be the history of the strangest cause of women in history, against men. However, Islamic society and history are most similar to the dominant history in ignoring women. And it has lost its quality as the history of the strange. This quality can be regained by including women in this history as a true and noble subject of Islam..."